<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manors maketh the movie; the houses of Pride and Prejudice 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/2009/07/manors-maketh-the-movie-the-houses-of-pride-and-prejudice-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/2009/07/manors-maketh-the-movie-the-houses-of-pride-and-prejudice-2005/</link>
	<description>The book, the movies and the BBC adaptations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:20:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/2009/07/manors-maketh-the-movie-the-houses-of-pride-and-prejudice-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/?p=413#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this info.  Will come in handy during the next trip across the pond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this info.  Will come in handy during the next trip across the pond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ku-chan</title>
		<link>http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/2009/07/manors-maketh-the-movie-the-houses-of-pride-and-prejudice-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Ku-chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myprideandprejudice.com/?p=413#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Pemberley would be a most agreeable marital home, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pemberley would be a most agreeable marital home, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
